Adaptive servo ventilation versus continuous or bi-level positive airway pressure: a review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and guidelines

CADTH
Record ID 32012000703
English
Authors' recommendations: The evidence suggests that ASV is effective in treating sleep apnea and CHF compared with CPAP or BiPAP. No evidence was found regarding the cost-effectiveness of ASV.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2012
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Canada
MeSH Terms
  • Humans
  • Inhalation
  • Heart Failure
  • Cheyne-Stokes Respiration
  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
  • Positive-Pressure Respiration
Contact
Organisation Name: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Contact Address: 600-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1S 5S8 Canada. Tel: +1 613 226 2553; Fax: +1 613 226 5392;
Contact Name: requests@cadth.ca
Contact Email: requests@cadth.ca
Copyright: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.