[Evaluation of surrogate variables in oncology. Advanced and metastatic breast cancer]

Abdel-Kader Martin L, Castillo Munoz MA, Flores Moreno S, Lacalle Remigio JR, Beltran Calvo C
Record ID 32012000487
Spanish
Authors' recommendations: RESULTS The RR and the DFS, followed by TTP, are the surrogate variables most frequently analyzed in the RCTs conducted on ABC or MBC. Regarding the correlation between the surrogate variables and the OS, the results of this study show that first-line chemotherapy in patients with ABC or MBC, and considering only MBC patients, a weak relationship exists between the surrogate variable DFS and the OS. The surrogate variables that correlated best with the OS, in ABC or MBC and considering MBC only, are the TTP and RR. Several studies have evaluated the correlation between treatment effect on the OS and on the potential surrogate variables in ABC or MBC and considering only patients with MBC. In patients in firstline treatment for MBC, the RR, the DFS and the TTP showed a moderate association with the OS. CONCLUSION The use of the variables TTP and RR in RCTs that evaluate the efficacy of anticancer drugs in first-line chemotherapy in patients with ABC or MBC may be appropriate, although it is important to consider the magnitude of their variations.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2011
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Spain
MeSH Terms
  • Humans
  • Biomarkers
  • Models, Statistical
  • Research Design
  • Breast Neoplasms
Contact
Organisation Name: Andalusian Health Technology Assessment Area
Contact Address: Area de Evaluacion de Tecnologias Sanitarias Sanitarias de Andalucia (AETSA) Avda. InnovaciĆ³n, s/n Edificio Arena 1. Sevilla (Spain) Tel. +34 955 006 309
Contact Name: aetsa.csalud@juntadeandalucia.es
Contact Email: aetsa.csalud@juntadeandalucia.es
Copyright: Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.