[Robotic surgery for benign gynecologic disease]

Sundfeldt K, Alfonzo E, Daxberg E-L, Einarsson S, Otterlind L, Paulsson M, Strandell A, Wikberg Adania U, Bergh C
Record ID 32011001687
Swedish
Authors' objectives:

Is robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery better than laparotomy, or laparoscopy, in women having myomectomy for uterus-preserving purpose, excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis or hysterectomy on benign indication, considering serious complications, hospital stay, operating time, bleeding, quality of life, conversion to laparotomy, and ergonomics. Specifically for myomectomy; live birth, pregnancy and uterine rupture during pregnancy are considered.

Authors' recommendations: There is low level of evidence for shortened hospital stay, reduced blood loss, and longer operating time, with robotic-assisted myomectomy, compared to open surgery. There is also low level of evidence for robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy resulting in shorter hospital stay, and in longer operating time, compared with laparascopic hysterectomy. For all other comparisons between the robotic-assisted, and open or laparoscopic surgery, the level of evidence is very low.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2011
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
MeSH Terms
  • Female
  • Robotics
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Contact
Organisation Name: The Regional Health Technology Assessment Centre
Contact Address: The Regional Health Technology Assessment Centre, Region Vastra Gotaland, HTA-centrum, Roda Straket 8, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, 413 45 GOTHENBORG, Sweden
Contact Name: hta-centrum@vgregion.se
Contact Email: hta-centrum@vgregion.se
Copyright: The Regional Health Technology Assessment Centre (HTA-centrum), Region Vastra Gotaland
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.