Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding and post-menopausal bleeding): Systematic reviews, IPD meta-analysis and model based economic evaluation
Cooper NA, Barton PM, Breijer M, Caffrey O, Opmeer BC, Timmermans A, Mol BW, Khan KS, Clark TJ
            Record ID 32011000650
            English
                                    
                Authors' objectives:
                
                                                To determine the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of various tests and test combinations for the investigation of heavy menstrual bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding
                Authors' recommendations:
                For initial investigation of women presenting to secondary care with HMB who do not require preservation of their fertility, our research suggests a choice between OPH alone or a combination of OPH and EBx. From our investigation, OPH appears to be the optimal first-line diagnostic test used for the investigation of women presenting to secondary care with HMB wishing to preserve their fertility or refractory to previous medical treatment with the LNG-IUS. We would suggest that the current recommendation of basing the initial investigation of women with PMB on the universal TVS measurement of endometrial thickness at a 5-mm threshold may need to be replaced by a strategy of restricting TVS to women with risk factors (e.g. increasing age-raised body mass index, diabetes or nulliparity), obtained from the preceding clinical assessment.
            
                                    
            Details
                        
                Project Status:
                Completed
            
                                                            
                Year Published:
                2014
            
                                    
                URL for published report:
                http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta18240/#/abstract
            
                                                
                URL for additional information:
                http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/volume-18/issue-24#hometab4
            
                                    
                English language abstract:
                An English language summary is available
            
                                    
                Publication Type:
                Not Assigned
            
                                    
                Country:
                England, United Kingdom
            
                                                
                        MeSH Terms
            - Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Menorrhagia
- Postmenopause
- Uterine Hemorrhage
Contact
                        
                Organisation Name:
                NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
            
            
                        
                Contact Address:
                NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
            
                                    
                Contact Name:
                journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
            
                                    
                Contact Email:
                journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
            
                                    
                Copyright:
                <p>2014 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO</p>
            
                    
                This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.