The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of technologies used to visualise the seizure focus in people with refractory epilepsy being considered for surgery: a systematic review and decision-analytical model

Record ID 32011000638
English
Authors' objectives:

Before surgery can take place, the epileptic focus must be identified. To do this a range of diagnostic tests can be used. In the UK NHS, usual practice is to obtain details of the person's medical history, undertake a clinical examination, and perform an electroencephalogram (EEG) with electrodes applied to the scalp and a routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. Individuals will usually go on to have continuous video and EEG recording with electrodes applied to the scalp in order to record seizures and identify the likely seizure focus. If these are unsuccessful in locating the epileptic focus three broad alternatives will need to be considered. Firstly, if there is a clear indication as to the site of the seizure focus the person may be admitted to hospital for continuous invasive EEG monitoring with electrodes inserted into, or across the surface of, the brain. Secondly, if there is no clear indication as to the site of the seizure focus, and it is considered unlikely that the patient will benefit from surgery, a decision might be made not to continue with the pre-surgical evaluation. Thirdly, and the most common, would be a decision to proceed with further, non-invasive, investigations such as specialised imaging scans or magnetoencephalography (MEG). The main aim of these investigations is to provide further information about the likely site of the seizure focus so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with invasive EEG monitoring, proceed to surgery, or to halt the pre-surgical evaluation.

We will undertake a systematic review to determine the added value of these non-invasive technologies in this decision making process and investigate the cost-effectiveness of these technologies. The cost of conducting further research will also be investigated.

Authors' recommendations: Study finds that clinical research into imaging for the localisation of epileptic foci is abundant but not adequately informative. Future appropriately designed studies are needed to determine the added value of diagnostic regimens in terms of informing decisions on the appropriateness of surgery and in terms of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2012
URL for published report: http://www.hta.ac.uk/2331
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: England, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
  • Epilepsy
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Seizures
  • Tomography, X-Ray
Contact
Organisation Name: NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme
Contact Address: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK
Contact Name: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Contact Email: journals.library@nihr.ac.uk
Copyright: 2012 Queen's Printer and Controller of HMSO
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.