[Treatment of patients with acute stroke in stroke units (with or without early supported discharge)]
Hamidi V, Wisloff T, Ringerike T, Linnestad KK, Harboe I, Klemp M
Record ID 32010001806
English, Norwegian
Authors' recommendations:
Care in ordinary stroke units resulted in probably lower mortality than care in general medical wards, whereas there was possibly little or no difference between the two strategies for moderate or severe stroke sequelae. The comparison of two different stroke units (with and without early discharge) showed possibly little or no difference in mortality and dependency with care in stroke units with early supported discharge.
Based on our health economic model, it appeared that ordinary stroke unit care was cost-effective relative to conventional care. Moreover, stroke unit care followed by early supported discharge was cost-effective compared with ordinary stroke unit care.
The sensitivity analyses indicated that stroke unit care followed with early supported discharge most likely was the most cost-effective strategy. Future research on this comparison will possibly give a better picture of the relationship between these two ways of organizing stroke care.
Details
Project Status:
Completed
URL for project:
http://www.kunnskapssenteret.no/Publikasjoner/9699.cms?language=english&threepage=1
Year Published:
2010
English language abstract:
An English language summary is available
Publication Type:
Not Assigned
Country:
Norway
MeSH Terms
- Length of Stay
- Patient Discharge
- Rehabilitation Centers
- Stroke
- Treatment Outcome
Contact
Organisation Name:
Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Contact Address:
Universitetsgata 2, Postbox 7004 St. Olavs plass, NO-0310 Oslo NORWAY. Tel: +47 23 25 50 00; Fax: +47 23 25 50 10;
Contact Name:
Berit.Morland@nokc.no, dagny.fredheim@nokc.no
Contact Email:
Berit.Morland@nokc.no, dagny.fredheim@nokc.no
Copyright:
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.