[Laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological disease]

Holte TO, Goderstad JM, Lieng M, Busund B, Norderhaug IN
Record ID 32010001791
English, Norwegian
Authors' recommendations: Ectopic pregnancy One Cochrane review was included that assessed laparoscopic versus open surgery for ectopic pregnancy (5). We did not find any relevant newer RCTs in our updated search. Overall there is low quality evidence that laparoscopic surgery was less effec-tive than open surgery. In addition the implication of these findings is uncertain due to old studies. Benign ovarian cysts One Cochrane review was included that assessed laparoscopic versus open surgery for benign ovarian cysts (6). We did not find any relevant RCTs in our updated search. Overall there is low to medium quality evidence that laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cysts gave shorter hospital stay, less pain, fewer postoperative infections, and quicker recovery than the open surgery. The surgical approach is similar for laparoscopic removal of ectopic pregnancies and ovarian cysts, and laparoscopic surgery has been shown to be less traumatic than open surgery. Due to small stud-ies, we were not able to assess rare complications. Hysterectomy for benign disease One Cochrane review was included that assessed laparoscopic versus open surgery for benign ovarian cysts (9, 11). We found 13 relevant RCTs in our updated search (se attachment “vedlegg” 3), five of which were included in the updated Cochrane review (11). Overall there is low to medium quality evidence that laparoscopic hysterectomy gave shorter hospital stay, quicker recovery, fewer wound infections and fever episodes after surgery compared with open surgery. The drawbacks were longer operation time and a higher risk of bladder or urethra injury. No benefits of laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal procedure have been docu-mented. The vaginal procedure has shown shorter operation time than the laparoscopic procedure, and a systematic review concluded that the vaginal procedure should be chosen.
Details
Project Status: Completed
Year Published: 2009
English language abstract: An English language summary is available
Publication Type: Not Assigned
Country: Norway
MeSH Terms
  • Female
  • Genital Diseases, Female
  • Laparoscopy
Contact
Organisation Name: Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Contact Address: Universitetsgata 2, Postbox 7004 St. Olavs plass, NO-0310 Oslo NORWAY. Tel: +47 23 25 50 00; Fax: +47 23 25 50 10;
Contact Name: Berit.Morland@nokc.no, dagny.fredheim@nokc.no
Contact Email: Berit.Morland@nokc.no, dagny.fredheim@nokc.no
Copyright: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC)
This is a bibliographic record of a published health technology assessment from a member of INAHTA or other HTA producer. No evaluation of the quality of this assessment has been made for the HTA database.